In a confused welter of artistic licence, this is the classical music biopic which makes 'Song to Remember'look like a masterpiece. Bogarde succeeds in diminishing the reputation of the musical colossus who spanned European music for most of the 19th Century. The absurdities of the plot, the sequoia-like quality of the acting and the prevalence of historical,musical and linguistic anachronisms combine to elevate this offering to the status of an A1 turkey.How a pianist of the stature of Bolet came to be mixed up in this fiasco can only be guessed at. The characterisation of Liszt fails to convey even a minute impression of his magnetic personality and the overwhelming effect that he had on not only his audiences, but also his pianistic rivals.Clara Schumann herself said that 'we toil over that which Liszt reads at sight!' Whilst the emphasis seems to focus on his romantic prowess,rather than his status as the greatest pianist of the century or,arguably, of all time, one feels,nevertheless, that this was an opportunity lost.
無語了!1989版的借錯成這部…
In a confused welter of artistic licence, this is the classical music biopic which makes 'Song to Remember'look like a masterpiece.
为啥这部片的布景无数次让我想起格蕾丝·凯利那部The Swan,连少数演员都长得很神似
太纯情了,恋情居然是外力结束的,我还以为李斯特会再次变心呢,美国真是清教的可恶,什么都要往宗教上扯。
音樂好,但結局宗教味濃,不太接受。
Copyright © 2008-2020 网站地图